Parent-Child Relationship Cases Before the ECtHR

Dagmara, R.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/77471

Or use following links to share this resource in social networks: Recommend this item

Title	Parent-Child Relationship Cases Before the ECtHR
Authors	Dagmara, R.
ORCID
Keywords	право на справедливий суд право на справедливое судебное разбирательство right to a fair trial право на сімейне життя право на семейную жизнь right to family life батьківський авторитет родительский авторитет parental authority батьківська турбота родительская забота parental care доступ / контакт доступ / контакт access / contact Європейська конвенція про права людини Европейская конвенция о правах человека European Convention on Human Rights
Type	Article
Date of Issue	2020
URI	https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/77471
Publisher	Sumy State University
License
Citation	Dagmara Rajska (2020). Parent-Child Relationship Cases Before the ECtHR. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(1), 36-64. http://doi.org/10.21272/sec.4(1).36-64.2020.
Abstract	This paper summarizes the arguments and counterarguments within the scientific discussion on the issue of choosing between Article 6 (Right to a fair trial) or/and Article 8 (Right to family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereafter ‘ECHR’) when being applied by the European Court of Human Rights (hereafter ‘ECtHR’) in parent-child relationship cases. The main purpose of this research is to understand these provisions and their interplay. There is no particular systematization of literary sources and approaches for solving this problem, because it is new. The analysis of applications lodged before the ECtHR indicates that the applicants usually raise both provisions for the reason of procedural safety. What is the response of the ECtHR?
Appears in Collections:	SocioEconomic Challenges (SEC)