Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/80682
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks:
Tweet
Recommend this item
Title | Management of education in the context of its financial support as a public-private good |
Authors |
Vasylieva, Tetiana Anatoliivna
Lieonov, Serhii Viacheslavovych Vorontsova, Anna Serhiivna |
ORCID |
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0635-7978 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-3008 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0603-3869 |
Keywords |
фінансова підтримка financial support система навчання впродовж життя lifelong learning system суспільні блага public goods приватні товари private goods |
Type | Article |
Date of Issue | 2018 |
URI | https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/80682 |
Publisher | Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW |
License | Copyright not evaluated |
Citation | Vasylieva, T.A. Management of education in the context of its financial support as a public-private good / T.A. Vasylieva, S.V. Lyeonov, A.S. Vorontsova // Annals of Marketing Management & Economics. - 2018. - Vol. 4, № 1. - Р. 163-173. - DOI: 10.22630/AMME.2018.4.1.12. |
Abstract |
In the article the essence and main characteristics of public and private goods are investigated, their main differences are revealed. Based on this, the main features of public goods were identified, including the nature of consumption, exclusivity of consumption, level of competition in providing services, exhaustiveness of services, level of social significance, etc. A comparative analysis of the peculiarities of funding for education at different levels (primary, secondary education, post-secondary/total tertiary education) and funding sources (public and private expenditures) has been conducted. It is substantiated that the basis for determining the optimal financial support structure for LLS development should be the level of compliance of educational services with the criteria for meeting public and private goods. On the basis of this, it was found that the ratio of budget and extrabudgetary funding for basic education services should be 90 to 10%; for vocational education services – 60–70% to 30–40%; and for services of additional education – 20–40% to 60–80%. |
Appears in Collections: |
Наукові видання (ННІ ФЕМ) |
Views
Argentina
1
China
1
France
1
Germany
117686
Greece
1
Indonesia
1
Ireland
235373
Lithuania
1
Netherlands
310
Singapore
1
Sweden
1
Ukraine
20846393
United Kingdom
440159691
United States
-2107206291
Vietnam
4114
Zambia
1
Downloads
Brazil
1
Canada
1981177
China
1
Germany
3104
Indonesia
1
Lithuania
1
Singapore
1
South Korea
1
Ukraine
20846394
United Kingdom
4339315
United States
-1645842714
Vietnam
1
Files
File | Size | Format | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|
Vasylieva_AMME_1_2018.pdf | 420.53 kB | Adobe PDF | -1618672717 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.