Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/82239
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks:
Tweet
Recommend this item
Title | The Institution of Honorary Supervisors in the System of Public Education of the Russian Empire in the First Half of the 19th Century (The Case of the Kharkov Educational District): Duties, Career, Social Status, and Education Level. Part 1 |
Authors |
Dehtiarov, Serhii Ivanovych
![]() Polyakova, L.G. |
ORCID |
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0885-2721 |
Keywords |
Russian Empire Ministry of Public Education honorary supervisor uyezd school Kharkov Educational District nobility |
Type | Article |
Date of Issue | 2020 |
URI | https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/82239 |
Publisher | Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o. |
License | Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International |
Citation | Sergey I. Degtyarev, Lyubov G. Polyakova. The Institution of Honorary Supervisors in the System of Public Education of the Russian Empire in the First Half of the 19th Century (The Case of the Kharkov Educational District): Duties, Career, Social Status, and Education Level. Part 1. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2020, 9(2): 451-458. |
Abstract |
This paper offers an insight into some of the key practices associated with the operation of
the institution of honorary supervisors in the system of public education of the Russian Empire in
the first half of the 19th century. Only a member of the noble estate could be an honorary
supervisor. These functionaries were an important part of the empire’s public education system.
They oversaw the work of uyezd (district) schools and provided them with financial assistance.
Honorary supervisors were not salaried but could be awarded a high title and receive a major state
award for their efforts, which could significantly raise their social status.
Honorary supervisors had a wide purview over the operation of the schools they oversaw.
They took part in resolving facilities issues and attended examinations and monthly teacher
meetings. These functionaries could also petition senior management for the remuneration or
punishment of particular school functionaries. Conversely, honorary supervisors with a negligent
attitude toward their duties could legitimately face dismissal by the university administration. |
Appears in Collections: |
Наукові видання (ННІП) |
Views

1

34277

1

74

1

1

366

29471639

767868

113322294

430796433

845
Downloads

1

259

1

1

1

1

3850606

1

83042892

1

1
Files
File | Size | Format | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|
Degtyarev_public_education.pdf | 395.46 kB | Adobe PDF | 86893765 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.