Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/84566
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks:
Tweet
Recommend this item
Title | Comparative analysis of the performance of mixing rules for density prediction of simple chemical mixtures |
Authors |
Babalola, F.U.
Akanji, I.O. Oyegoke, T. |
ORCID | |
Keywords |
equation of state mixing rule density predictions chemical mixtures thermodynamics models |
Type | Article |
Date of Issue | 2021 |
URI | https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/84566 |
Publisher | Sumy State University |
License | Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International |
Citation | Babalola F. U., Akanji I. O., Oyegoke T. (2021). Comparative analysis of the performance of mixing rules for density prediction of simple chemical mixtures. Journal of Engineering Sciences, Vol. 8(1), pp. F25–F31, doi: 10.21272/jes.2021.8(1).f4 |
Abstract |
Four different mixing rules (MRs) in three equations of state (EOSs) have been used to account for the
intermolecular forces of attraction between dissimilar molecules of different substances that form simple mixtures. The
combined effects of the co-volumes of all constituent species of the mixtures were also considered, and the densities
of these simple mixtures were predicted. Thereafter, the density results obtained were compared with accurately
simulated experimental density values, and the effectiveness of these MRs was determined and compared. The four
MRs compared are geometric mean average (GMA), whole square root average (SRA), Expanded geometric average
(EGA), and simple average (SA) of attractive force parameter. They were all used in Van der Waals, Redlich Kwong,
and Peng Robinson EOSs for two simple mixtures: a binary system (Ammonia – Water system) and a ternary mixture
(methyl acetate – water – toluene system). It was found that GMA and EGA gave reasonably accurate estimates of the
mixture attractive force parameter (am) and hence good density prediction for both Ammonia – Water and Methyl
acetate – Water – Toluene systems. SRA gave unrealistic values of mixture densities for both systems and was
discarded. SA gave a somewhat good result with Peng Robinson EOS for the ammonia-water system, but not that good
in Redlich Kwong EOS and very poor in Van der Waals EOS. SA does not give reasonable estimates of the mixture
densities with the three EOSs considered for the methyl acetate – water – toluene system. |
Appears in Collections: |
Journal of Engineering Sciences / Журнал інженерних наук |
Views

1

696712452

1

50401907

2256

1

1

1

8192

1

1

14801925

312939295

1

1

4403474

1215840

696712449

1

256
Downloads

1161

1

1

242105430

1

1

8805790

16384

312939293

1
Files
File | Size | Format | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|
Babalola_jes_1_2021.pdf | 402.52 kB | Adobe PDF | 563868063 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.