Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/86397
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks:
Tweet
Recommend this item
Title | Meta-analysis of the literature related to SDG 3 and its investment |
Authors |
Plastun, Oleksii Leonidovych
Makarenko, Inna Oleksandrivna Serpeninova, Yuliia Serhiivna Situm, M. |
ORCID |
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8208-7135 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7326-5374 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3565-1132 |
Keywords |
ЦСР ЦУР SDG сталий розвиток устойчивое развитие sustainable development метааналіз метаанализ meta-analysis |
Type | Article |
Date of Issue | 2021 |
URI | https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/86397 |
Publisher | Business Perspectives |
License | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
Citation | Makarenko, Inna, Alex Plastun, Mario Situm, Yuliia Serpeninova and Giuseppe Sorrentino (2021). Meta-analysis of the literature related to SDG 3 and its investment. Public and Municipal Finance, 10(1), 119-137. doi:10.21511/pmf.10(1).2021.10 |
Abstract |
2020 revealed the vulnerability of the healthcare systems in most countries. It also highlighted their failure to generate serious progress in the fulfillment of Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG 3): Ensure healthy lives and promote welfare for all at all ages. One of the key problems inhibiting its progress is the lack of financial resources. Based on a comprehensive meta-analysis of the literature related to SDG 3 and its investment, it aims to demonstrate that lack of appropriate academic support is a part of the failure to generate serious progress in the fulfillment of SDG 3. To do this academic literature published in the period 2010–2019 is analyzed. SciVal Elsevier, VosViewer, and Google Trends tools are applied for analysis. The results show that there is a significant interest in the academic circles on SDG 3 alone. However, this interest is concentrated toward its medical aspects while economic aspects, including investment, are poorly represented. This study shows that the reason for the current investment gap in SDG 3 is the lack of academic support to provide a theoretical, methodological, and analytical framework for tackling the financing problem for SDG 3. |
Appears in Collections: |
Наукові видання (ННІ БіЕМ) |
Views
Australia
-2043125085
Austria
1
Bangladesh
1
Belgium
-587275445
Canada
-18552767
China
993368017
Finland
62454307
France
1658036483
Germany
-587275446
Greece
-1182492566
Hong Kong SAR China
1014823486
Hungary
1
India
-1827710777
Indonesia
-1827710776
Iran
10635
Ireland
171546
Israel
1
Italy
757782062
Japan
765905085
Kenya
64022
Lithuania
1
Malaysia
102386
Netherlands
70731
New Zealand
1071037177
Nigeria
1986725400
Norway
1
Philippines
1538584591
Poland
690360
Singapore
1
Slovakia
70750
South Africa
-1827710785
South Korea
1
Spain
145024
Sweden
70742
Switzerland
2071590204
Taiwan
1538584582
Turkey
-1182492567
Ukraine
757782064
United Arab Emirates
757782057
United Kingdom
-1827710786
United States
-587275447
Unknown Country
-2059975594
Vietnam
690368
Downloads
Australia
627711151
Austria
1
Bangladesh
70747
Brazil
1
Canada
1
China
-2043125087
Ethiopia
1
France
1
Germany
993368016
Hong Kong SAR China
690370
India
-1827710774
Indonesia
313002732
Italy
40612273
Lithuania
1
Malaysia
1
Netherlands
10647
New Zealand
10629
Oman
1
Peru
1
Poland
291063362
Romania
582126281
Serbia
1
Singapore
1
Slovakia
1
South Africa
-1827710784
South Korea
1801081083
Spain
217
Taiwan
1
Turkey
5370789
Ukraine
189789
United Arab Emirates
1
United Kingdom
-18552764
United States
-1827710780
Unknown Country
-2059975593
Vietnam
1493013516
Files
File | Size | Format | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|
Plastun_meta-analysis.pdf | 1.75 MB | Adobe PDF | 838503130 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.