Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/87547
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks:
Tweet
Recommend this item
Title | New Perspectives on May’s Theorem and the Median Voter Theorem |
Authors |
Fast, R.
|
ORCID | |
Keywords |
теорема Мея теорема Мэя May’s theorm теорема медіанного виборця теорема медианного избирателя median votertheorem державна політика государственная политика public policy громадський вибір общественный выбор public choice, колективне прийняття рішень коллективное принятие решений collective decision making демократія демократия democracy поведінка при голосуванні поведение при голосовании voting behavior |
Type | Article |
Date of Issue | 2022 |
URI | https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/87547 |
Publisher | Sumy State University |
License | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
Citation | Fast, R. (2022). New Perspectives on May’s Theorem and the Median Voter Theorem. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(1), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.6(1).40-45.2022 |
Abstract |
The paper defines and analyzes May’s Theorem and the Median Voter Theorem from the Public Policy and Public Choice literature and seeks to compare and contrast the use of both. Through the use of theoretical and applied examples, the paper demonstrates how collective decision-making research has evolved to better inform public policy. Building on Black’s (1948) notion that it is the voter in the ideological middle that decides elections, Holcombe (1980) provides an empirical analysis of this theory, Scervini (2012) attempts to show that the middle class (median) voter decides taxation and redistribution policy, Rowley (1984) takes a New Institutional approach to analyzing voters’ preferences, Groot and van der Linde (2016) conducts a cross-country analysis to see if the Median Voter Theorem holds true across time and cultures, Carrillo and Castanheira (2008) show that voters change their behavior from the preference of the median voter as the press reveals new information about the quality of candidates which alters voters’ perceptions, and Congleton (2003) asserts there may not always be a median voter with examples. Building on May’s Theorem that voting is an aggregation of voters’ preferences, Hotelling (1929), Black (1948), Maskin (1999), Duggan (2015), and Brady and Chambers (2017) expand on social preference theory showing that Arrow (1951) and May (1952)’s work needed to be updated to include verifiable, empirical tests and further refinements. The paper shows how public policy analysis and group decision making theory and application have evolved over the past 75 years and shines some light on areas for future research and analysis. These findings are important because it will help make candidates and policy proposals more palatable to voters in the ideological middle (median voter) who, as the studies show, often determines the winner. The paper will be of interest to anyone involved in public policy and group decision making processes. |
Appears in Collections: |
Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks (FMIR) |
Views
Australia
-1884273817
Austria
1
Belgium
70280714
Canada
217775
Chile
1
China
1207708941
Denmark
1
Finland
293
France
1
Germany
-1524313198
Greece
3229
Hong Kong SAR China
-1885746833
India
1
Iran
1
Ireland
499992739
Italy
1
Japan
175021252
Lithuania
1
Norway
1
Poland
122062
Portugal
1
Romania
1
Serbia
1
Singapore
-1270844081
South Korea
2063596816
Sweden
1
Switzerland
-1699439459
Turkey
669076
Ukraine
-788409030
United Kingdom
396186135
United States
175021248
Unknown Country
692708927
Uruguay
1
Vietnam
3231
Zimbabwe
1
Downloads
Australia
166564053
Austria
1
Belgium
1
Canada
345415420
China
-1884273819
Denmark
1
Finland
1
France
1053487788
Germany
1053487789
Hong Kong SAR China
300
India
776740264
Indonesia
1
Ireland
1
Israel
1
Italy
1
Japan
29492490
Kenya
1
Latvia
1
Lithuania
2442094
Mongolia
1
Namibia
1
Netherlands
1053487792
Poland
1753279135
Portugal
1
South Africa
1053487796
Spain
1
Sweden
1
Switzerland
1
Turkey
5988154
Ukraine
-788409029
United Kingdom
175021246
United States
175021251
Unknown Country
1053487793
Uruguay
1
Vietnam
1
Zimbabwe
1
Files
File | Size | Format | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|
Fast_fmir_1_2022.pdf | 304.26 kB | Adobe PDF | 1729753240 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.