Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/93650
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks: Recommend this item
Title A comparison of online peer assessment and face-to-face peer assessment
Authors Güven, U.
Kush, J.
Behlül Bilal, S.
ORCID
Keywords online peer assessment
face-to-face peer assessment
objective assessment
peer grading
Type Article
Date of Issue 2023
URI https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/93650
Publisher Sumy State University
License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Citation Güven, U., Kush, J., & Behlül Bilal, S. (2023). A COMPARISON OF ONLINE PEER ASSESSMENT AND FACE-TO-FACE PEER ASSESSMENT. Philological Treatises, 15(2), 91–100. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.21272/Ftrk.2023.15(2)-10
Abstract The main objective of this study was to compare students’ face-to-face and online peer assessment grades. In the first phase of the study, each student presented their work within a traditional classroom setting. The other students and the instructor provided grades based on a predefined rubric. In the second phase of the study, the same students presented their work within the same traditional classroom setting, however this time students and the instructor provided grades with their smartphones through a Web 2.0 tool. The study used student grades as the independent variable and grading method (face-to-face and online) as the dependent variable. Students’ peer assessments were also compared with the instructor’s grades to see in which assessment environment students gave instructor-like grades. Several paired t-tests were computed to compare groups. The results indicated that the students’ grades in face-to-face format was significantly higher than the students’ grades in online setting as well as the instructor’s face to face grades. In contrast, students provided instructor-like grades in online peer assessment setting. The study concluded that students give higher grades in face-to-face assessment setting. The most likely reason for this result is the peer pressure that exists in traditional classroom environment.
Appears in Collections: Філологічні трактати

Views

China China
3444
Germany Germany
1
Indonesia Indonesia
1
Singapore Singapore
1
Ukraine Ukraine
17
United States United States
7022
Unknown Country Unknown Country
21086

Downloads

China China
3445
Indonesia Indonesia
1
Ukraine Ukraine
1
United States United States
3447
Unknown Country Unknown Country
21086

Files

File Size Format Downloads
Güven_Ftrk_2_2023.pdf 262.43 kB Adobe PDF 27980

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.