Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/93786
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks:
Tweet
Recommend this item
Title | Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab versus the EXTREME regimen as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: KESTREL, a randomized, open-label, phase III study |
Authors |
Psyrri, A.
Fayette, J. Vynnychenko Harrington, K. Gillison, M. Ahn, M.-J. Takahashi, S. Weiss, J. Machiels, J.-P. Baxi, S. Vasilyev, A. Karpenko, A. Dvorkin, M. Hsieh, C.-Y. Thungappa, S.C. Segura, P.P. Vynnychenko, Ihor Oleksandrovych Haddad, R. Kasper, S. Mauz, P.-S. Baker, V. He, P. Evans, B. Wildsmith, S. Olsson, R.F. Yovine, A. Kurland, J.F. Morsli, N. Seiwert, T.Y. |
ORCID |
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2339-6509 |
Keywords |
Durvalumab tremelimumab kestrel randomized |
Type | Article |
Date of Issue | 2023 |
URI | https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/93786 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
License | Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
Citation | Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab versus the EXTREME regimen as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: KESTREL, a randomized, open-label, phase III study / A. Psyrri et al. // Annals of Oncology. 2023. Vol. 34, Issue 3. P. 262-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.008 |
Abstract |
Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) have a poor
prognosis. The phase III KESTREL study evaluated the efficacy of durvalumab [programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)
antibody] with or without tremelimumab [cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody], versus
the EXTREME regimen in patients with R/M HNSCC.
Patients and methods: Patients with HNSCC who had not received prior systemic treatment for R/M disease were
randomized (2 : 1 : 1) to receive durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) plus tremelimumab 75 mg Q4W (up to
four doses), durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg Q4W, or the EXTREME regimen (platinum, 5-fluorouracil, and
cetuximab) until disease progression. Durvalumab efficacy, with or without tremelimumab, versus the EXTREME
regimen in patients with PD-L1-high tumors and in all randomized patients was assessed. Safety was also assessed.
Results: Durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab were not superior to EXTREME for overall survival (OS) in
patients with PD-L1-high expression [median, 10.9 and 11.2 versus 10.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 1⁄4
0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.32; P 1⁄4 0.787 and HR 1⁄4 1.05; 95% CI 0.80-1.39, respectively]. Durvalumab
and durvalumab plus tremelimumab prolonged duration of response versus EXTREME (49.3% and 48.1% versus 9.8%
of patients remaining in response at 12 months), correlating with long-term OS for responding patients; however,
median progression-free survival was longer with EXTREME (2.8 and 2.8 versus 5.4 months). Exploratory analyses
suggested that subsequent immunotherapy use by 24.3% of patients in the EXTREME regimen arm contributed to
the similar OS outcomes between arms. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) for durvalumab,
durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and EXTREME were 8.9%, 19.1%, and 53.1%, respectively. |
Appears in Collections: |
Наукові видання (НН МІ) |
Views
Belgium
1
Japan
1
Singapore
1
Ukraine
2
United States
22
Unknown Country
1
Downloads
Japan
1
United Kingdom
1
United States
22
Unknown Country
1
Files
File | Size | Format | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|
Psyrri_Durvalumab.pdf | 568.16 kB | Adobe PDF | 25 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.