Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/97677
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks: Recommend this item
Title Energy Poverty and Democratic Values: A European Perspective
Authors Kwilinski, Aleksy  
Liulov, Oleksii Valentynovych  
Pimonenko, Tetiana Volodymyrivna  
ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6318-4001
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4865-7306
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-3684
Keywords sustainable development
energy efficiency
energy price
democracy
energy poverty
European Union
Type Article
Date of Issue 2024
URI https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/97677
Publisher MDPI
License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Citation Kwilinski, A.; Lyulyov, O.; Pimonenko, T. Energy Poverty and Democratic Values: A European Perspective. Energies 2024, 17, 2837. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17122837.
Abstract This paper explores the complex relationship between energy poverty and the maintenance of democratic values within the European Union (EU), suggesting that energy poverty not only impacts economic stability and health outcomes but also poses significant challenges to democratic engagement and equity. To measure energy poverty, a composite index is developed using the entropy method, which surpasses traditional measures focused solely on access to energy or its developmental implications. To assess the level of democratic governance in EU countries, the voice and accountability index (VEA), which is part of the World Governance Indicators compiled by the World Bank, is utilized. By analyzing EU data from 2006 to 2022, the findings suggest that a 1% improvement in VEA quality, represented by a coefficient of 0.122, is correlated with a notable improvement in the energy poverty index. This suggests that the EU should focus on enhancing transparency and public participation in energy decision-making, along with ensuring accountability in policy implementation. The research also differentiates between full and flawed democracies, noting that tailored approaches are needed. In full democracies, leveraging economic prosperity and trade is crucial due to their significant positive impacts on the energy poverty index. In contrast, in flawed democracies, enhancing governance and accountability is more impactful, as evidenced by a higher coefficient of 0.193. Strengthening legal and regulatory frameworks, improving regulatory quality, and ensuring public engagement in governance could substantially mitigate energy poverty in these contexts. In addition, this paper demonstrates that this relationship is influenced by factors such as income inequality, energy intensity, and trade openness.
Appears in Collections: Наукові видання (ННІ БіЕМ)

Views

Downloads

Files

File Size Format Downloads
Kwilinski_energy_price.pdf 908.94 kB Adobe PDF 0

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.