Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/97677
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks:
Tweet
Recommend this item
Title | Energy Poverty and Democratic Values: A European Perspective |
Authors |
Kwilinski, Aleksy
Liulov, Oleksii Valentynovych Pimonenko, Tetiana Volodymyrivna |
ORCID |
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6318-4001 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4865-7306 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-3684 |
Keywords |
sustainable development energy efficiency energy price democracy energy poverty European Union |
Type | Article |
Date of Issue | 2024 |
URI | https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/97677 |
Publisher | MDPI |
License | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
Citation | Kwilinski, A.; Lyulyov, O.; Pimonenko, T. Energy Poverty and Democratic Values: A European Perspective. Energies 2024, 17, 2837. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17122837. |
Abstract |
This paper explores the complex relationship between energy poverty and the maintenance
of democratic values within the European Union (EU), suggesting that energy poverty not only
impacts economic stability and health outcomes but also poses significant challenges to democratic
engagement and equity. To measure energy poverty, a composite index is developed using the
entropy method, which surpasses traditional measures focused solely on access to energy or its
developmental implications. To assess the level of democratic governance in EU countries, the voice
and accountability index (VEA), which is part of the World Governance Indicators compiled by
the World Bank, is utilized. By analyzing EU data from 2006 to 2022, the findings suggest that a
1% improvement in VEA quality, represented by a coefficient of 0.122, is correlated with a notable
improvement in the energy poverty index. This suggests that the EU should focus on enhancing
transparency and public participation in energy decision-making, along with ensuring accountability
in policy implementation. The research also differentiates between full and flawed democracies,
noting that tailored approaches are needed. In full democracies, leveraging economic prosperity and
trade is crucial due to their significant positive impacts on the energy poverty index. In contrast, in
flawed democracies, enhancing governance and accountability is more impactful, as evidenced by a
higher coefficient of 0.193. Strengthening legal and regulatory frameworks, improving regulatory
quality, and ensuring public engagement in governance could substantially mitigate energy poverty
in these contexts. In addition, this paper demonstrates that this relationship is influenced by factors
such as income inequality, energy intensity, and trade openness. |
Appears in Collections: |
Наукові видання (ННІ БіЕМ) |
Views
Downloads
Files
File | Size | Format | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|
Kwilinski_energy_price.pdf | 908.94 kB | Adobe PDF | 0 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.