Навчально-науковий інститут бізнес-технологій «УАБС» (ННІ БТ) (1980-2021)
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://devessuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/48923
Browse
278 results
Search Results
Item Sustainable Development in Judaism(Israel Information Center, 2002) Чейн, Самуель; Чейн, Самуэль; Chayen, SamuelItem Jerusalem Phytotoxic Microorganisms. Ecological and Applicative Aspects(The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1992) Чейн, Самуель; Чейн, Самуэль; Chayen, SamuelItem Phytotoxic Microorganisms and their Impact on the Allelopathic Phenomenon in the Negev Desert of Israel(1991) Чейн, Самуель; Чейн, Самуэль; Chayen, SamuelItem Enviromental Factors Affecting Phytotoxic Activity of soilborne Actinomycetes(Spanish Society of Microbiology, 1992) Чейн, Самуель; Чейн, Самуэль; Chayen, SamuelItem Phytotoxic Microorganisms: Ecological and Applicative Aspects(Spanish Society of Microbiology, 1992) Чейн, Самуель; Чейн, Самуэль; Chayen, SamuelItem Teaching future specialists of banking oral business communication(IATEFL-Ukraine, 2002) Книш, K.В.Стаття присвячена особливостям навчання усного професійного спілкування, а саме процесу навчання студентів - майбутніх спеціалістів банківської справи - усному діловому спілкуванню англійською мовою.Item Market for corporate control in Ukraine(Business Perspectives, 2003) Костюк, Олександр Миколайович; Костюк, Александр Николаевич; Kostiuk, Oleksandr MykolaiovychThe paper considers the recent trends at the market for corporate control in Ukraine. As a result of the undertaken original research, some very important conclusions have been made. First of all, during 1998-2001 corporate ownership structure in Ukraine became more concentrated, in contrast to such country in transition as Russia. Second, the more concentrated is the ownership structure of Ukrainian companies the lower corporate market performance happens to be. Besides, the group of controllers, who are most efficient in corporate governance, are for-eign institutional investors. Finally, the most active players at the market for corporate control in Ukraine are financial-industrial groups, but their activity in buying shares of Ukrainian companies is not correspondent to the lower degree of efficiency in corporate governance.Item Market for executives in Ukraine: executive decision making and its efficiency(Wiley, 2003) Kostyuk, Olexander; Костюк, Олександр МиколайовичTransformation of the structure of corporate ownership in Ukraine should be followed with transformation of approaches to decision making at all levels. This concerns executives, who are responsible for the day-to-day management of a company. As Berle and Means noted, to govern companies effectively, executives should avoid conflict of interests and managerial opportunism. This will facilitate reducing agency costs and improve corporate performance. From this perspective, executive nomination and monitoring play the most important role in reaching the above objective. Both these corporate control mechanisms are established by shareholders. Therefore, we suppose that the executive performance depends on the structure of corporate ownership and the type of controlling owner.Item Why Do Some Senior Managers Inflate Firms’ Reported Earnings? Economic Causes and Potential Solutions(Virtus Interpress, 2007) Костюк, Олександр Миколайович; Костюк, Александр Николаевич; Kostiuk, Oleksandr Mykolaiovych; Sridharan, V.G.; Navissi, F.We examine the economic reasons underlying the behavior of some senior managers to inflate their firms’ reported earnings. While the extant literature cites accounting and corporate governance structure as potential reasons that facilitate the inflating tendency, we conjecture that opportunism at different hierarchical levels within firms do not leave much scope for some senior managers to improve firms’ fundamental performance. To protect their personal utility, they resort to inflating tendency, but only if the firms’ corporate governance has loopholes. A major solution offered here is to improve firms’ internal management control system which could reduce within- firm opportunism. However, this solution must accompany improvements to corporate governance.Item Market for Executives in Ukraine(Virtus Interpress, 2005) Костюк, Олександр Миколайович; Костюк, Александр Николаевич; Kostiuk, Oleksandr MykolaiovychTransformation of the structure of corporate ownership in Ukraine should be followed with transformation of approaches to decision making at all levels. This concerns executives, who are responsible for the day-to-day management of a company. As Berle and Means noted, to govern companies effectively, executives should avoid conflict of interests and managerial opportunism. This will facilitate reducing agency costs and improve corporate performance. From this perspective, executive nomination and monitoring play the most important role in reaching the above objective. Both these corporate control mechanisms are established by shareholders. Therefore, we suppose that an executive performance depends on the structure of corporate ownership and the type of controlling owner. Regrettably, since the beginning the process of privatization in 1992 no research has been conducted to answer the question: "Is there a relationship between ownership structure and efficiency of decision making by executives?"