Наукові видання (ІФСК)
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://devessuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/116
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item "Журнал Министерства народного просвещения" как источник по истории высшего образования в Российской империи XIX – начала ХХ веков: вопрос научной аттестации кадров(Cherkas Global University; Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o., 2020) Лебідь, Андрій Євгенійович; Лебедь, Андрей Евгеньевич; Lebid, Andrii Yevheniiovych; Honcharenko, A.V.; Shevchenko, N.A.В статье рассмотрен потенциал "Журнала Министерства народного просвещения" как источника по истории высшего образования в Российской империи XIX – начала ХХ веков. На основании анализа материалов журнала (объявлений о защите диссертаций) изучены вопросы научной аттестации кадров в российских университетах. Рассмотрены структура и тематическая направленность журнала. Обозначено, что во многом они были определены личностью редактора и министра народного просвещения, их виденьем миссии журнала. В этом контексте выявлены траектории эволюции журнала за все время его существования: политематический журнал; научно-педагогический; педагогический; официальный вестник; научный журнал. В результате проведенного исследования обнаружено незначительное количество информации о защите магистерских и докторских диссертаций – всего 13 записей, и то только о защите магистерских диссертаций в двух российских университетах – Московском и Санкт-Петербургском. Установлено, что объявления о защитах диссертации публиковались не в основной части журнала, а в новостной рубрике, где подавалась информация о целом ряде второстепенных "происшествий". То, как обстоят дела с освещением на страницах журнала вопросов научной аттестации, делает невозможным объективную ее оценку и выводы о количестве защищенных диссертаций на соискание степени магистра и доктора в университетах Российской империи, руководствуясь исключительно этим источником. Выдвинуто предположение, что более полная информация по этому вопросу может быть обнародована на страницах официальных вестников, ученых записок, известий университетов, других документов Министерства народного просвещения. В целом отмечается значительный потенциал "Журнала Министерства народного просвещения" как информативного, просветительского и консультативного источника по истории образования в Российской империи.Item Ukrainian "Enlightened Bureaucracy" in the System of Higher Education of the Russian Empire in the ХІХ century(Cherkas Global University; Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o, 2021) Лебідь, Євген Олександрович; Лебедь, Евгений Александрович; Lebid, Yevhen Oleksandrovych; Shevchenko, N.A.The article reveals the influence of representatives of Ukrainian "enlightened bureaucrac" on the processes of formation and development of higher education system of the Russian Empire in the XIX century, in particular, legal education on the example of the Moscow and St. Petersburg Imperial Universities. To this end, an attempt was made to systematically examine the life and career of P.G. Redkin, a native of Romny (Sumy Region), who was one of the representatives of Ukrainian "enlightened bureaucracy". Redkin's contribution to the development of higher education system, as well as his influence on the intellectual life of the Russian Empire is considered in this manuscript in several aspects. Firstly, it is educational activity of P.G. Redkin as an Extraordinary and Ordinary Professor, Head of the Chair of Encyclopedia or General Review of Law System of the Moscow Imperial University (1835-1848); Chair of Encyclopedia and History of Law Philosophy of the Saint Petersburg Imperial University (1863-1873), Rector of the Saint Petersburg Imperial University (1873-1876); Honorary Member of this University (1878). Secondly, it is public and state activity of P.G. Redkin as a founder and publisher of the first law journal in the Russian Empire, founder of educational community, popularizer of universal literacy and professional education of teachers, etc. Thirdly, it is the scientific activity of P.G. Redkin, the author of fundamental works on the history and philosophy of law, an honorary member of the Imperial Academy of Sciences. It is shown that scientific, social, state and pedagogical activity of Redkin, Varadinov and other representatives of Ukrainian "enlightened bureaucracy" significantly affected not only the sphere of higher education and science in the Russian Empire, but also the system of state and public relationsItem The Organization of the Educational Process in Kharkov Imperial University (1835–1863)(Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o., 2021) Лебідь, Андрій Євгенійович; Лебедь, Андрей Евгеньевич; Lebid, Andrii Yevheniiovych; Shevchenko, N.A.This paper analyzes ‘The Review of Instruction in Subjects at Kharkov Imperial University’, an official document that regulated the organization of the educational process in Kharkov Imperial University. The work provides an insight into the evolution of modifications to the titles of this historical source for the entire period it was published. It examines the document’s substantive and formal characteristics such as structure, format, and data presentation. A quantitative analysis of data from the document helped establish a list of disciplines and courses taught at the university and measure the weekly academic load of students in Kharkov Imperial University (in hours), which made it possible to also measure this load across terms and for instructors as well. The study helped establish certain distinctive characteristics of the document – more specifically, the fact that it contained recommendations regarding scholarly and scholarlyinstructional study guides that instructors were to use in their work. Such recommendations were eventually replaced with a list of recommended literature for each course taught at the university. The present paper also provides dynamic data on the quantitative composition of the teaching workforce in each specific department. The authors established the scholarly-pedagogical potential of Kharkov Imperial University in the period between Nicholas’s University Statute of 1835 and Alexander’s University Statute of 1863. It was established that, in addition to their primary duties at the university, professors also gave public lectures, which had them adapting their courses to the needs and interests of the public. As a rule, giving public lectures was not a burden on instructors, as it was voluntary in nature.Among other matters, the authors researched the nonacademic component of university education – more specifically, the teaching of the “pleasing arts”. Based on this, a conclusion was drawn that the model of higher education in the Russian Empire in the 19th century was focused on the all-round development of a person.