Наукові видання (ННІП)
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://devessuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/157
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Mediation in the case of a juvenile committing a criminal offense or a felony(EDITORIAL PRIMMATE SAS, 2022) Рєзнік, Олег Миколайович; Резник, Олег Николаевич; Rieznik, Oleh Mykolaiovych; Бондаренко, Ольга Сергіївна; Бондаренко, Ольга Сергеевна; Bondarenko, Olha Serhiivna; Уткіна, Марина Сергіївна; Уткина, Марина Сергеевна; Utkina, Maryna Serhiivna; Янішевська, Катерина Дмитрівна; Янишевская, Екатерина Дмитриевна; Yanishevska, Kateryna Dmytrivna; Ільченко, Олександр Васильович; Ильченко, Александр Васильевич; Ilchenko, Oleksandr VasylovychAs a general rule, punishment should be necessary and sufficient to correct the person and re-educate him. At the same time, a punitive approach prevails in the criminal process in Ukraine. For criminal law, the introduction of the mediation institution determines the development of the legal institution of reconciliation. The article aims to characterize the essence of mediation in Ukraine and study foreign countries' best practices in this field. The object of the study is public relations in the field of mediation in the case of a minor committing a criminal offense or a felony for the first time. The subject of the study is mediation as an alternative to court proceedings in the case of a juvenile committing a criminal offense or a felony for the first time. The authors used some methods of scientific knowledge: analytical, phenomenological, generalization, comparative law. Particular attention in the study is paid to the analysis of the essence of punishment, the study of international experience in the use of mediation, and the practice of mediation in criminal proceedings in Ukraine, which currently takes place only as part of an experiment. The authors conclude that it is essential and urgent to use the mediation procedure more widely in criminal proceedings as an alternative to litigation. It is emphasized that the full implementation of this institution requires political will and broad support from civil society. Namely, his readiness to resolve disputes without a court, but only with the help of a mediator.Item Proof during the prejudicial inquiry of smugglingofnarcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors under the legislation of Ukraine(Revista Amazonia Investiga, 2021) Рєзнік, Олег Миколайович; Резник, Олег Николаевич; Rieznik, Oleh Mykolaiovych; Pochtovyi, M.; Янішевська, Катерина Дмитрівна; Янишевская, Екатерина Дмитриевна; Yanishevska, Kateryna Dmytrivna; Butyrskyi, A.The object of the study is social relations regarding the prejudicial inquiry of smuggling narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs or precursors. It has been found that there are scholars who choose different definitions for interpreting the nature of the proof, but are unanimous about the role of this process in proving a person’s guilt and choosing an adequate punishment. The authors use a set of scientific methods of modern epistemology as well as comparative, special legal, logical and other methods. We propose to analyze all the circumstances that are subject to proof during the prejudicial inquiry of smuggling of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors. In this paper must identify the general grounds that must be proved in each crime and the specific circumstances that are important to prove only in the case of smuggling narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors. The conclusion is made about the importance of proper procedural support of criminal prosecution of persons who have committed a crime under Article 305 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Therefore, we propose to include in the subject of evidence for the prejudicial inquiry.