Наукові видання (ННІП)
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://devessuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/157
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Координація прокуратурою діяльності правоохоронних органів у сфері протидії корупційній злочинності(Харківський національний університет внутрішніх справ, 2023) Бондаренко, Ольга Сергіївна; Бондаренко, Ольга Сергеевна; Bondarenko, Olha Serhiivna; Янішевська, Катерина Дмитрівна; Янишевская, Екатерина Дмитриевна; Yanishevska, Kateryna DmytrivnaУ статті обґрунтовано, що для правової держави завдання з протидії злочинності завжди буде відігравати колосальне значення. Запобігання злочинності – це процес, спрямований на зменшення кількості кримінальних правопорушень у певній сфері. Аналізується сутність координаційної діяльності прокуратури щодо правоохоронних органів, яка здійснюється з метою протидії корупції. Проаналізовано стан корупційної злочинності та визначено роль інституційної складової та загладженої співпраці для реалізації антикорупційної стратегії боротьби зі злочинністю. Охарактеризовано сутність та рівень фактичної реалізації форм координаційної діяльності прокуратури щодо правоохоронних органів, яка здійснюється з метою протидії корупції.Item Mediation in the case of a juvenile committing a criminal offense or a felony(EDITORIAL PRIMMATE SAS, 2022) Рєзнік, Олег Миколайович; Резник, Олег Николаевич; Rieznik, Oleh Mykolaiovych; Бондаренко, Ольга Сергіївна; Бондаренко, Ольга Сергеевна; Bondarenko, Olha Serhiivna; Уткіна, Марина Сергіївна; Уткина, Марина Сергеевна; Utkina, Maryna Serhiivna; Янішевська, Катерина Дмитрівна; Янишевская, Екатерина Дмитриевна; Yanishevska, Kateryna Dmytrivna; Ільченко, Олександр Васильович; Ильченко, Александр Васильевич; Ilchenko, Oleksandr VasylovychAs a general rule, punishment should be necessary and sufficient to correct the person and re-educate him. At the same time, a punitive approach prevails in the criminal process in Ukraine. For criminal law, the introduction of the mediation institution determines the development of the legal institution of reconciliation. The article aims to characterize the essence of mediation in Ukraine and study foreign countries' best practices in this field. The object of the study is public relations in the field of mediation in the case of a minor committing a criminal offense or a felony for the first time. The subject of the study is mediation as an alternative to court proceedings in the case of a juvenile committing a criminal offense or a felony for the first time. The authors used some methods of scientific knowledge: analytical, phenomenological, generalization, comparative law. Particular attention in the study is paid to the analysis of the essence of punishment, the study of international experience in the use of mediation, and the practice of mediation in criminal proceedings in Ukraine, which currently takes place only as part of an experiment. The authors conclude that it is essential and urgent to use the mediation procedure more widely in criminal proceedings as an alternative to litigation. It is emphasized that the full implementation of this institution requires political will and broad support from civil society. Namely, his readiness to resolve disputes without a court, but only with the help of a mediator.Item Proof during the prejudicial inquiry of smugglingofnarcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors under the legislation of Ukraine(Revista Amazonia Investiga, 2021) Рєзнік, Олег Миколайович; Резник, Олег Николаевич; Rieznik, Oleh Mykolaiovych; Pochtovyi, M.; Янішевська, Катерина Дмитрівна; Янишевская, Екатерина Дмитриевна; Yanishevska, Kateryna Dmytrivna; Butyrskyi, A.The object of the study is social relations regarding the prejudicial inquiry of smuggling narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs or precursors. It has been found that there are scholars who choose different definitions for interpreting the nature of the proof, but are unanimous about the role of this process in proving a person’s guilt and choosing an adequate punishment. The authors use a set of scientific methods of modern epistemology as well as comparative, special legal, logical and other methods. We propose to analyze all the circumstances that are subject to proof during the prejudicial inquiry of smuggling of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors. In this paper must identify the general grounds that must be proved in each crime and the specific circumstances that are important to prove only in the case of smuggling narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors. The conclusion is made about the importance of proper procedural support of criminal prosecution of persons who have committed a crime under Article 305 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Therefore, we propose to include in the subject of evidence for the prejudicial inquiry.Item Review of the state anti-corruption institutions effectiveness in Ukraine(Universidad de la Amazonia, 2021) Бондаренко, Ольга Сергіївна; Бондаренко, Ольга Сергеевна; Bondarenko, Olha Serhiivna; Уткіна, Марина Сергіївна; Уткина, Марина Сергеевна; Utkina, Maryna Serhiivna; Думчиков, Михайло Олександрович; Думчиков, Михаил Александрович; Dumchykov, Mykhailo Oleksandrovych; Prokofieva-Yanchylenko, D.; Янішевська, Катерина Дмитрівна; Янишевская, Екатерина Дмитриевна; Yanishevska, Kateryna DmytrivnaThe objective of the article is a review of the state anti-corruption institutions' effectiveness in Ukraine. An important part of anti-corruption reform in Ukraine has been the complete transformation of anti-corruption institutions. That is why the authors try to use the most optimal methodology that would be able to ensure the comprehensiveness and completeness of the study: phenomenological; the descriptive; the hypothetic-deductive; the statistical; and the method of case law analysis. It is proposed to analyze the anti-corruption powers of general competence authorities in the sphere of anti-corruption. The authors analyzed the powers of specialized anti-corruption authorities' functioning: the National Agency on Corruption Prevention; the National Anti-Corruption Bureau; the National Agency for finding, tracing, and management of assets derived from corruption and other crimes; the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office and the High Anti-Corruption Court. The conclusion is drawn that, realizing the need of the anti-corruption task, the state has developed an extensive and relatively closed system of specialized anti-corruption authorities. Almost all bodies of state power and local self-government have acquired certain anti-corruption competencies. The authors made conclusion that such dispersion of powers, and in some cases their duplication, does not simplify, but rather complicates the effectiveness of combating corruption.