Проблемні питання здійснення фіксування адміністративного процесу

Abstract

Охарактеризовано суть поняття фіксування адміністративного процесу, способи здійснення, детально розглянуто процес фіксування та проблеми, які виникають на практиці. Розроблено теоретично обґрунтовані рекомендації щодо удосконалення норм чинного Кодексу адміністративного судочинства України, які регулюють здійснення фіксування адміністративного процесу.

Охарактеризованы сущность понятия фиксации административного процесса, способы осуществления, подробно рассмотрен процесс фиксирования и проблемы, которые возникают на практике. Разработаны теоретически обоснованные рекомендации по совершенствованию норм действующего Кодекса административного судопроизводства Украины, которые регулируют осуществление фиксирования административного процесса.

According the Constitution of Ukraine the rights and freedoms of human and citizen are protected under the corresponding forms of action by the courts of administrative, economic, constitutional, criminal and civil justice. In the constitutional state the court proceeding is based on the rules fixed by its fundamental law. These rules provide the rights of trial participants, guarantees of their realization in such manner as to create real opportunity for each interested party to realize his/her constitutional right for court protection. Thus, basic principles of court proceedings in the constitutional state have democratic features and common human rights focus. The Constitution of Ukraine, Code of administrative procedure of Ukraine and the Law “On the Judicial Organization and Status of Judges” provide administrative legal proceedings principles. A big difference among them makes the transparency and openness principle of administrative procedure that includes administrative procedure recording according to the Code of administrative procedure of Ukraine. Administrative procedure recording means court’s official activity on sequential display of the trial proceedings course, preservation of procedural acts committed by the administrative procedure members that is realized by using audio recorder, keeping court registry and drawing up respective protocols under administrative and procedural rules. However, in practice there are a lot of problems with recording implementation, in particular, the gaps of legal regulation, absence of unified approach to understanding the place of trial proceeding registration by technical means among the fundamental proceeding principles, the delegation of secretary’s authorities to other persons, neglectful attitude of secretaries of judicial session to their duties, etc. Thus, an important question is a detailed review of the administrative procedure recording and developing proposals for improving the process of its implementation. This article describes the essence of the administrative procedure recording and methods of its implementation; it presents recording process problems that arise in practice. Theoretically substantiated recommendations for the improvement of the current Code of administrative procedure of Ukrainegoverning the administrative procedure recording have been elaborated.