The Institution of Honorary Supervisors in the System of Public Education of the Russian Empire in the First Half of the 19th Century (The Case of the Kharkov Educational District): Duties, Career, Social Status, and Education Level. Part 1

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2020

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o.
Article

Date of Defense

Scientific Director

Speciality

Date of Presentation

Abstract

This paper offers an insight into some of the key practices associated with the operation of the institution of honorary supervisors in the system of public education of the Russian Empire in the first half of the 19th century. Only a member of the noble estate could be an honorary supervisor. These functionaries were an important part of the empire’s public education system. They oversaw the work of uyezd (district) schools and provided them with financial assistance. Honorary supervisors were not salaried but could be awarded a high title and receive a major state award for their efforts, which could significantly raise their social status. Honorary supervisors had a wide purview over the operation of the schools they oversaw. They took part in resolving facilities issues and attended examinations and monthly teacher meetings. These functionaries could also petition senior management for the remuneration or punishment of particular school functionaries. Conversely, honorary supervisors with a negligent attitude toward their duties could legitimately face dismissal by the university administration.

Keywords

Russian Empire, Ministry of Public Education, honorary supervisor, uyezd school, Kharkov Educational District, nobility

Citation

Sergey I. Degtyarev, Lyubov G. Polyakova. The Institution of Honorary Supervisors in the System of Public Education of the Russian Empire in the First Half of the 19th Century (The Case of the Kharkov Educational District): Duties, Career, Social Status, and Education Level. Part 1. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2020, 9(2): 451-458.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By