Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorШкодкіна, Юлія Михайлівна-
dc.contributor.authorШкодкина, Юлия Михайловна-
dc.contributor.authorShkodkina, Yuliia Mykhailivna-
dc.contributor.authorPakauskas, D.-
dc.identifier.citationShkodkina, Yu. Comparative Analysis of Plagiarism Detection Systems [Текст] / Yu. Shkodkina, D. Pakauskas // Business Ethics and Leadership. - 2017. - Vol. 1, Issue 3. - P. 27-35.uk_UA
dc.description.abstractThis article compares plagiarism detection systems according to the list of criteria, compiled from the most challenging and important features for users in Ukrainian higher educational institutions. In addition it describes types of text-based plagiarism and provides an overview of the most common and serious forms of plagiarism around the world and in Ukraine in particular. The authors carried out a comparative analysis of three plagiarism detection systems − Turnitin, Unicheck, eTXT − and highlighted advantages and disadvantages of each one for the use in Ukraine. However, in further studies there might be a need for revising and expanding the list of criteria depending on the subject and the aim of using plagiarism checkers.uk_UA
dc.publisherSumy State Universityuk_UA
dc.subjectplagiarism detection systemuk_UA
dc.subjecttext-based plagiarismuk_UA
dc.subjectplagiarism formsuk_UA
dc.subjectсистема виявлення плагіатуuk_UA
dc.subjectтекстовий плагіатuk_UA
dc.subjectформи плагіатуuk_UA
dc.subjectсистема обнаружения плагиатаuk_UA
dc.subjectплагиат на основе текстаuk_UA
dc.subjectформы плагиатаuk_UA
dc.titleComparative Analysis of Plagiarism Detection Systemsuk_UA
Appears in Collections:Business Ethics and Leadership (BEL)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatDownloads 
Shkodkina-Pakauskas_BEL_3_2017.pdf465.14 kBAdobe PDF956Download

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.