Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/80682
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks: Recommend this item
Title Management of education in the context of its financial support as a public-private good
Authors Vasylieva, Tetiana Anatoliivna  
Lieonov, Serhii Viacheslavovych  
Vorontsova, Anna Serhiivna  
ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0635-7978
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-3008
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0603-3869
Keywords фінансова підтримка
financial support
система навчання впродовж життя
lifelong learning system
суспільні блага
public goods
приватні товари
private goods
Type Article
Date of Issue 2018
URI https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/80682
Publisher Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW
License Copyright not evaluated
Citation Vasylieva, T.A. Management of education in the context of its financial support as a public-private good / T.A. Vasylieva, S.V. Lyeonov, A.S. Vorontsova // Annals of Marketing Management & Economics. - 2018. - Vol. 4, № 1. - Р. 163-173. - DOI: 10.22630/AMME.2018.4.1.12.
Abstract In the article the essence and main characteristics of public and private goods are investigated, their main differences are revealed. Based on this, the main features of public goods were identified, including the nature of consumption, exclusivity of consumption, level of competition in providing services, exhaustiveness of services, level of social significance, etc. A comparative analysis of the peculiarities of funding for education at different levels (primary, secondary education, post-secondary/total tertiary education) and funding sources (public and private expenditures) has been conducted. It is substantiated that the basis for determining the optimal financial support structure for LLS development should be the level of compliance of educational services with the criteria for meeting public and private goods. On the basis of this, it was found that the ratio of budget and extrabudgetary funding for basic education services should be 90 to 10%; for vocational education services – 60–70% to 30–40%; and for services of additional education – 20–40% to 60–80%.
Appears in Collections: Наукові видання (ННІ ФЕМ)

Views

China China
1
France France
1
Germany Germany
117686
Greece Greece
1
Indonesia Indonesia
1
Ireland Ireland
235373
Lithuania Lithuania
1
Netherlands Netherlands
310
Sweden Sweden
1
Ukraine Ukraine
20846393
United Kingdom United Kingdom
440159691
United States United States
1265033854
Vietnam Vietnam
4114
Zambia Zambia
1

Downloads

Brazil Brazil
1
Canada Canada
1981177
China China
1
Germany Germany
3104
Indonesia Indonesia
1
Lithuania Lithuania
1
South Korea South Korea
1
Ukraine Ukraine
20846394
United Kingdom United Kingdom
4339315
United States United States
803670280
Vietnam Vietnam
1

Files

File Size Format Downloads
Vasylieva_AMME_1_2018.pdf 420,53 kB Adobe PDF 830840276

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.