Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/82650
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks: Recommend this item
Title Judicial Practice as a Pre-Condition for Preventing Contradictory Judicial Decisions
Authors Kolesnikova, Mariia Viktorivna  
Kyselova, Olena Ivanivna  
Vasylchenko, O.
Svyrydova, L.
Kibets, D.
ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3060-158X
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-0952
Keywords Practice
Judicial Practice
Court
Judicial Decision
Source of Law
Type Article
Date of Issue 2020
URI https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/82650
Publisher Allied Business Academies
License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Citation Judicial Practice as a Pre-Condition for Preventing Contradictory Judicial Decisions / Mariia Kolesnikova, Elena Kiselyova, Oksana Vasylchenko, Liudmyla Svyrydova, Daria Kibets. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues. 2020. Vol. 23, Issue: 5.
Abstract The article is devoted to the study of the judicial practice essence as a pre-condition for preventing contradictory judicial decisions. It is made the analysis of recent publications and researches on the specifics of judicial practice, classification of judicial practices, advantages and risks of the judicial practice existence as a source of law. It is released the features of the judicial practice use in the activity of the European Union Court, the European Court of Human Rights, noted at the same time the feasibility of a systematic updating of the judicial practices, which is associated with the society development, the change of the legal regulation of social relations. It is noted that States that have ratified the Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms have undertaken to use the practice of the European Court of Human Rights as a judicial practice. It is established that one of the potential innovations of the judicial reform of Ukraine is the introduction of the Institute of exemplary decisions to reduce the burden on judges, ensure the unity of law-enforcement practice, rapid and uniform solution of similar cases, which also indicates the possible use of judicial practice in Ukraine. It is noted that the primary questions that require answers are still determining the subject authorized to create judicial practices, establishing the legal bases for the existence of judicial practice, since ignoring these aspects will lead to the fact that judicial practice as a source of law negatively affect the quality of justice, will slow down the development of the state as democratic and legal.
Appears in Collections: Наукові видання (ННІП)

Views

China China
1359385
Finland Finland
1
France France
1
Germany Germany
1841206
Hungary Hungary
1
India India
1
Indonesia Indonesia
1
Ireland Ireland
395748
Japan Japan
1
Lithuania Lithuania
1
Malaysia Malaysia
1
Netherlands Netherlands
86
Norway Norway
1
Singapore Singapore
223924252
Slovenia Slovenia
1
Sweden Sweden
834
Switzerland Switzerland
1
Ukraine Ukraine
16404055
United Kingdom United Kingdom
16404054
United States United States
447848510
Unknown Country Unknown Country
1
Vietnam Vietnam
1669
Zambia Zambia
1

Downloads

France France
1
India India
1
Lithuania Lithuania
1
Malaysia Malaysia
447848506
Poland Poland
1
Singapore Singapore
447848506
Slovenia Slovenia
1
Sweden Sweden
1
Ukraine Ukraine
41889002
United Kingdom United Kingdom
170
United States United States
447848508
Vietnam Vietnam
1
Zambia Zambia
182

Files

File Size Format Downloads
Kolesnikova_Judicial_practice_as_a_pre_condition.pdf 257.83 kB Adobe PDF 1385434881

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.