Історичні традиції благодійності та актуальний стан фандрейзингової діяльності у вищій освіті України
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2014
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Сумський державний педагогічний університет імені А.С. Макаренка
Article
Date of Defense
Scientific Director
Speciality
Date of Presentation
Abstract
Автором статті схарактеризовано сутність та взаємозв’язок ключових понять дослідження; проаналізовано історичні тенденції та закономірності розвитку благодійності; систематизовано події, пов’язані з меценатством; виокремлено ключові суб’єкти благодійної діяльності в кожен із визначених періодів; обґрунтовано основні етапи генезису благодійності в Україні; з’ясовано актуальний стан фандрейзингової діяльності в національній системі вищої освіти; а також окреслено перспективи розвитку освітнього фандрейзингу, як інструменту диверсифікації джерел ресурсного забезпечення університету в контексті
неоліберальної ідеології сучасних освітніх реформ.
Автором статтьи охарактеризована сущность и взаимосвязь ключевых понятий исследования; проанализированы исторические тенденции и закономерности развития благотворительности; систематизированы события, связанные с меценатством; выделены ключевые субъекты благотворительной деятельности в каждом из определенных периодов; обоснованы основные этапы генезиса благотворительности в Украине; вияснено актуальное состояние фандрейзинговой деятельности в национальной системе высшего образования; а также намечены перспективы развития образовательного фандрейзинга, как инструмента диверсификации источников ресурсного обеспечения университета в контексте неолиберальной идеологии современных образовательных реформ.
The American system of higher education is admired around the world, both for its quality and diversity. Despite criticisms that are sometimes directed toward U.S. universities, they are regarded as models by many institutions elsewhere around the world. Ukraine is undergoing a dramatic transition in its higher education system. Previously reliant entirely on the government, Ukrainian universities now face declining government funding and are being encouraged to develop alternative sources of support. At the same time, strengthening higher education is viewed as a critical national strategy for growth in a global economy based on information technology. In this time of change, many universities are seeking to emulate higher education in the United States, especially with regard to the development of philanthropic support. Ukraine has also got deeply rooted giving traditions, which we find useful to understand in order to determine how or whether to adapt successful national practices, combined with the progressive American experience, to our contemporary situation in higher education. Thus, the following paper introduces definitions of the key terms used in the research and analyses their etymology as well as the way they relate to each other in an integrated whole. The establishment of common definitions is a criterion of science. The fields of institutional advancement and educational fundraising have yet to achieve such commonality, and although the paper does not resolve that problem, it offers some important distinctions. In the paper, the author provides an overview of the historical tendencies and models of philanthropic giving in Ukrainian society that shed the light on why people give and on the factors and processes that influenced that behavior. Moreover, the timeline of key philanthropic events in Ukraine that refer to the patronage of education and culture, beginning with the Paleolithic age up to the present days, is compiled; and the list of benefactors, set in their social context, in each of the specified periods is presented in the paper. Furthermore, the paper places contemporary educational fundraising in the context of history. It is not only a history of philanthropy but rather brief history of organized fundraising in Ukraine. Eventually, the focus is on the actual state of fundraising practices in the national system of higher education. The evolution of the professional field and the prospects for the development of educational fundraising as a tool to diversify sources of extramural support for universities, in the context of the neoliberal ideology of modern educational reforms, are discussed.
Автором статтьи охарактеризована сущность и взаимосвязь ключевых понятий исследования; проанализированы исторические тенденции и закономерности развития благотворительности; систематизированы события, связанные с меценатством; выделены ключевые субъекты благотворительной деятельности в каждом из определенных периодов; обоснованы основные этапы генезиса благотворительности в Украине; вияснено актуальное состояние фандрейзинговой деятельности в национальной системе высшего образования; а также намечены перспективы развития образовательного фандрейзинга, как инструмента диверсификации источников ресурсного обеспечения университета в контексте неолиберальной идеологии современных образовательных реформ.
The American system of higher education is admired around the world, both for its quality and diversity. Despite criticisms that are sometimes directed toward U.S. universities, they are regarded as models by many institutions elsewhere around the world. Ukraine is undergoing a dramatic transition in its higher education system. Previously reliant entirely on the government, Ukrainian universities now face declining government funding and are being encouraged to develop alternative sources of support. At the same time, strengthening higher education is viewed as a critical national strategy for growth in a global economy based on information technology. In this time of change, many universities are seeking to emulate higher education in the United States, especially with regard to the development of philanthropic support. Ukraine has also got deeply rooted giving traditions, which we find useful to understand in order to determine how or whether to adapt successful national practices, combined with the progressive American experience, to our contemporary situation in higher education. Thus, the following paper introduces definitions of the key terms used in the research and analyses their etymology as well as the way they relate to each other in an integrated whole. The establishment of common definitions is a criterion of science. The fields of institutional advancement and educational fundraising have yet to achieve such commonality, and although the paper does not resolve that problem, it offers some important distinctions. In the paper, the author provides an overview of the historical tendencies and models of philanthropic giving in Ukrainian society that shed the light on why people give and on the factors and processes that influenced that behavior. Moreover, the timeline of key philanthropic events in Ukraine that refer to the patronage of education and culture, beginning with the Paleolithic age up to the present days, is compiled; and the list of benefactors, set in their social context, in each of the specified periods is presented in the paper. Furthermore, the paper places contemporary educational fundraising in the context of history. It is not only a history of philanthropy but rather brief history of organized fundraising in Ukraine. Eventually, the focus is on the actual state of fundraising practices in the national system of higher education. The evolution of the professional field and the prospects for the development of educational fundraising as a tool to diversify sources of extramural support for universities, in the context of the neoliberal ideology of modern educational reforms, are discussed.
Keywords
традиції благодійності, традиции благотворительности, philanthropic giving traditions, фандрейзингова діяльність, фандрейзинговая деятельность, fundraising practices, меценатство, філантропія, филантропия, вища освіта, высшее образование, higher education
Citation
Красуля, А. В. Історичні традиції благодійності та актуальний стан фандрейзингової діяльності у вищій освіті України // Педагогічні науки: теорія, історія, інноваційні технології. 2014. № 10 (44). С. 132–144.