Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/81639
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks: Recommend this item
Title Ethical Analysis of Office Romance and Sexual Favoritism Policies in the #MeToo Workplace and “Cancel Culture” Era
Authors Mujtaba, B.G.
Cavico, F.J.
ORCID
Keywords office romance
службовий роман
служебный роман
love contracts
любовные контракты
любовні контракти
sexual favoritism
сексуальний фаворитизм
сексуальный фаворитизм
ethical egoism
этический эгоизм
етичний егоїзм
ethical relativism
етичний релятивізм
этический релятивизм
utilitarianism
утилитаризм
утилітаризм
Kantian ethics
Кантова етика
Кантовская этика
Type Article
Date of Issue 2020
URI https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/81639
Publisher Sumy State University
License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Citation Mujtaba, B. G., Cavico, F. J. (2020). Ethical Analysis of Office Romance and Sexual Favoritism Policies in the #MeToo Workplace and “Cancel Culture” Era. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(4), 132-150. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.4(4).132-150.2020
Abstract While most employers, managers, and employees have heard and read much about the #MeToo movement, little academic attention has been devoted to ethical analysis of office romance and sexual favoritism polices in the modern workplace
Appears in Collections: SocioEconomic Challenges (SEC)

Views

Australia Australia
-986979978
Belgium Belgium
1984060220
Belize Belize
1
Canada Canada
-331828985
China China
794582393
Colombia Colombia
1
Czechia Czechia
1
Denmark Denmark
100714
France France
-331828989
Germany Germany
986617071
Ghana Ghana
1
Greece Greece
1
Hong Kong SAR China Hong Kong SAR China
700913437
Hungary Hungary
194965
India India
1984060200
Indonesia Indonesia
-331828986
Iran Iran
1
Ireland Ireland
700913430
Italy Italy
108388247
Japan Japan
1350881696
Kenya Kenya
108388248
Lithuania Lithuania
1
Malaysia Malaysia
1984060205
Morocco Morocco
1
Netherlands Netherlands
30100
Norway Norway
1
Pakistan Pakistan
1
Peru Peru
1
Philippines Philippines
-331828992
Portugal Portugal
40686
Puerto Rico Puerto Rico
135637
Romania Romania
56013493
Singapore Singapore
986617072
Slovakia Slovakia
1
South Africa South Africa
108093
Spain Spain
1
Sri Lanka Sri Lanka
1
Sweden Sweden
94500
Taiwan Taiwan
1508662908
Thailand Thailand
1
Turkey Turkey
-986979981
Ukraine Ukraine
40283
United Kingdom United Kingdom
687896462
United States United States
986617073
Unknown Country Unknown Country
318275331
Vietnam Vietnam
58239236
Zimbabwe Zimbabwe
1

Downloads

Australia Australia
1350881692
Canada Canada
46109
China China
1844941571
Czechia Czechia
1
France France
-331828987
Germany Germany
-986979975
Ghana Ghana
1
Hong Kong SAR China Hong Kong SAR China
700913438
Hungary Hungary
202032
India India
1984060215
Indonesia Indonesia
77454
Iran Iran
1
Ireland Ireland
1
Italy Italy
1
Japan Japan
1
Kenya Kenya
310302784
Lithuania Lithuania
1984060188
Malaysia Malaysia
1984060191
Netherlands Netherlands
1
Nigeria Nigeria
1
Pakistan Pakistan
1
Philippines Philippines
318275328
Portugal Portugal
1
Singapore Singapore
1508662879
South Africa South Africa
116755
South Korea South Korea
1
Spain Spain
1
Sri Lanka Sri Lanka
1
Sweden Sweden
700913446
Taiwan Taiwan
797760929
Turkey Turkey
696069
Ukraine Ukraine
24867
United Kingdom United Kingdom
154785
United States United States
858593953
Unknown Country Unknown Country
1844941570
Vietnam Vietnam
56013490

Files

File Size Format Downloads
Majtaba_Ethical_Analysis.pdf 942,62 kB Adobe PDF 2041988908

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.