Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/87547
Or use following links to share this resource in social networks: Recommend this item
Title New Perspectives on May’s Theorem and the Median Voter Theorem
Authors Fast, R.
ORCID
Keywords теорема Мея
теорема Мэя
May’s theorm
теорема медіанного виборця
теорема медианного избирателя
median votertheorem
державна політика
государственная политика
public policy
громадський вибір
общественный выбор
public choice,
колективне прийняття рішень
коллективное принятие решений
collective decision making
демократія
демократия
democracy
поведінка при голосуванні
поведение при голосовании
voting behavior
Type Article
Date of Issue 2022
URI https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/87547
Publisher Sumy State University
License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Citation Fast, R. (2022). New Perspectives on May’s Theorem and the Median Voter Theorem. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(1), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.6(1).40-45.2022
Abstract The paper defines and analyzes May’s Theorem and the Median Voter Theorem from the Public Policy and Public Choice literature and seeks to compare and contrast the use of both. Through the use of theoretical and applied examples, the paper demonstrates how collective decision-making research has evolved to better inform public policy. Building on Black’s (1948) notion that it is the voter in the ideological middle that decides elections, Holcombe (1980) provides an empirical analysis of this theory, Scervini (2012) attempts to show that the middle class (median) voter decides taxation and redistribution policy, Rowley (1984) takes a New Institutional approach to analyzing voters’ preferences, Groot and van der Linde (2016) conducts a cross-country analysis to see if the Median Voter Theorem holds true across time and cultures, Carrillo and Castanheira (2008) show that voters change their behavior from the preference of the median voter as the press reveals new information about the quality of candidates which alters voters’ perceptions, and Congleton (2003) asserts there may not always be a median voter with examples. Building on May’s Theorem that voting is an aggregation of voters’ preferences, Hotelling (1929), Black (1948), Maskin (1999), Duggan (2015), and Brady and Chambers (2017) expand on social preference theory showing that Arrow (1951) and May (1952)’s work needed to be updated to include verifiable, empirical tests and further refinements. The paper shows how public policy analysis and group decision making theory and application have evolved over the past 75 years and shines some light on areas for future research and analysis. These findings are important because it will help make candidates and policy proposals more palatable to voters in the ideological middle (median voter) who, as the studies show, often determines the winner. The paper will be of interest to anyone involved in public policy and group decision making processes.
Appears in Collections: Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks (FMIR)

Views

Australia Australia
303635614
Austria Austria
1
Belgium Belgium
70280714
Canada Canada
217775
Chile Chile
1
China China
1753279134
Denmark Denmark
1
Finland Finland
293
France France
1
Germany Germany
-1524313198
Greece Greece
3229
Hong Kong SAR China Hong Kong SAR China
298
India India
1
Iran Iran
1
Ireland Ireland
499992739
Italy Italy
1
Japan Japan
117102
Lithuania Lithuania
1
Norway Norway
1
Poland Poland
122062
Portugal Portugal
1
Romania Romania
1
Singapore Singapore
-1270844081
South Korea South Korea
2063596816
Sweden Sweden
1
Turkey Turkey
669076
Ukraine Ukraine
-788409030
United Kingdom United Kingdom
-1524313192
United States United States
1053487788
Unknown Country Unknown Country
692708927
Uruguay Uruguay
1
Vietnam Vietnam
3231
Zimbabwe Zimbabwe
1

Downloads

Australia Australia
2442105
Belgium Belgium
1
Canada Canada
345415420
China China
216491
Denmark Denmark
1
Finland Finland
1
France France
1053487788
Germany Germany
1053487789
Hong Kong SAR China Hong Kong SAR China
300
India India
776740264
Indonesia Indonesia
1
Ireland Ireland
1
Israel Israel
1
Italy Italy
1
Japan Japan
1175
Kenya Kenya
1
Latvia Latvia
1
Lithuania Lithuania
2442094
Namibia Namibia
1
Netherlands Netherlands
1053487792
Poland Poland
1753279135
Portugal Portugal
1
South Africa South Africa
1053487796
Spain Spain
1
Sweden Sweden
1
Turkey Turkey
5988154
Ukraine Ukraine
-788409029
United Kingdom United Kingdom
1385417855
United States United States
1053487789
Unknown Country Unknown Country
1053487793
Uruguay Uruguay
1
Vietnam Vietnam
1
Zimbabwe Zimbabwe
1

Files

File Size Format Downloads
Fast_fmir_1_2022.pdf 304,26 kB Adobe PDF 1214526135

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.